Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

In a case control study, 60 participants matched for age and gender were identified in three conditions: patients admitted with confirmed first myocardial infarction (MI), patients admitted with chest pain but with no evidence of MI, and a 'normal' control group. Amongst a number of measures, they completed the Pennebaker Inventory of Linguid Languidness (PILL) and Maastricht Questionnaire (MQ). Both MQ and PILL, alone and in combination, failed to discriminate between cardiac and non-cardiac patients, only between patients and controls. The implications of these results are discussed. © 1996 The British Psychological Society.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1111/j.2044-8287.1996.tb00511.x

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

1996-01-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

1

Pages

309 - 313

Total pages

4