Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study are to understand the needs and experiences of rapid access chest pain clinic attenders and to determine the acceptability and effectiveness of simple procedural changes. METHODS: Two qualitative studies of clinic attenders before and after procedural changes which were guided by the first study. RESULTS: Study 1: Patients wanted to be reassured, by knowing what was causing their pain, understanding the cause, and feeling able to help themselves. Often, these needs were not met, and uncertainties left some patients feeling ill-equipped to help themselves. Communication problems were identified. Study 2: The changes were acceptable to patients, and almost all were reassured. Most valued receiving extra verbal and written advice and information. Many felt more aware of cardiac risk factors and intended to change their lifestyle. CONCLUSION: There were clear opportunities for improvements in care. Changes in procedures helped patients to understand their pain, to practice self-management, and to consider altering their lifestyle.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.04.004

Type

Journal article

Journal

J Psychosom Res

Publication Date

10/2005

Volume

59

Pages

237 - 246

Keywords

Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Ambulatory Care Facilities, Attitude to Health, Chest Pain, Communication, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Program Development