Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Background: Many autistic individuals struggle with poor mental health and low self-esteem, in part, due to internalized stigma. Given the strengths-based perspective of the neurodiversity framework, it is likely that endorsing it or its subcomponents could serve as a protective factor against poor mental health and low self-esteem among autistic individuals. Methods: The present study sought to investigate (1) the relationship between endorsement of the neurodiversity framework and self-esteem and (2) whether this relationship differed between autistic and non-autistic adults. A diverse sample of 123 autistic adults and 104 non-autistic adults living in the United States completed an online survey. Results: Autistic participants reported having significantly lower self-esteem compared with non-autistic participants. We conducted linear regressions, with aspects of the neurodiversity framework as predictor variables, autism status as the moderator, self-esteem as the criterion variable, and demographic differences between autistic and non-autistic samples as control variables. There was a significant interaction between autism status and the Autism as Difference subscale of the neurodiversity framework in predicting self-esteem. In particular, endorsing this facet of the neurodiversity framework was associated with significantly higher self-esteem for autistic participants compared with autistic individuals who endorsed low levels of this facet. However, there was no difference in self-esteem for non-autistic participants who endorsed different levels of the Autism as Difference subscale. Conclusion: Although autistic participants indicate worse self-esteem than non-autistic participants, endorsing aspects of the neurodiversity framework may have a buffering effect on this relationship by mitigating aspects of internalized stigma. Further work must be conducted to elucidate causal relations, but the present study sets a foundation for improving mental health in autistic adults.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1177/25739581251398955

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2025-01-01T00:00:00+00:00