Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Despite the influence of oppression on the lives of persons with disabilities, disability studies concepts are underrepresented in psychological research. The aim of this study was to examine how endorsement of different models of disability relate to general systems justification beliefs and how this association may be moderated by one’s disability self-identification. The results demonstrated that higher levels of systems justification beliefs were positively and negatively correlated with endorsement of the medical and social models of disability respectively. When controlling for endorsement of the medical model, we found an interaction between disability status and endorsement of the social model of disability in predicting systems justification attitudes. Additionally, our analysis presented a negative interaction between disability status and endorsement of the social model in predicting systems justification attitudes among non-disabled respondents, but not respondents with disabilities. Our study highlights the crucial need for future research into the application of systems justification theory to critical disability studies and into social identity research.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1080/15298868.2025.2466454

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2025-01-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

24

Pages

217 - 231

Total pages

14