Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has significantly advanced our knowledge of how the brain enables us to perform cognitive operations. NIBS techniques are unique as they allow for experimentally manipulating neural activity in a specific brain network at a specific time point to systematically assess the consequence of such manipulations for task performance. To draw conclusive insights from NIBS studies, a carefully controlled design needs a variety of control conditions to ensure specificity of the observed effects. We discuss common pitfalls in designing NIBS studies and argue that adequate control strategies depend on the goals of a study and the intended claims. Well-controlled NIBS studies can contribute unique insight into brain-cognition relationships beyond functional neuroimaging. The combination of NIBS with imaging further allows testing and validating some assumptions made in behavioral NIBS studies, providing an avenue of network research into dynamic state-dependent cognitive brain circuits and their contribution to cognition.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1016/B978-0-443-26602-7.00008-7

Type

Chapter

Publication Date

2025-01-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

34

Pages

15 - 30

Total pages

15