Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Health systems are under increasing pressure as chronic disease becomes the dominant burden of care. Addressing this requires earlier detection and prevention, and predictive artificial intelligence (AI) tools are a demonstrable means of targeting interventions more effectively. Despite extensive research activity and substantial public funding, few predictive AI tools are translated effectively into routine care. We argue that the primary translational barrier is now organisational rather than solely methodological: without defined institutional ownership and long-term stewardship, including to support obtaining and maintaining regulatory certification and navigating governance structures, predictive AI tools cannot progress beyond print. Three interdependent recommendations are proposed to address this problem.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101954

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2026-06-19T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

33

Keywords

Artificial intelligence, Clinical Governance, Data Science, Implementation Science, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Prediction Algorithms