Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive models of psychosis suggest that whether anomalous experiences lead to clinically relevant psychotic symptoms depends on how they are appraised, the context in which they occur and the individual's emotional response. AIMS: To develop and validate a semi-structured interview (the Appraisals of Anomalous Experiences Interview; AANEX) to assess (a) anomalous experiences and (b) appraisal, contextual and response variables. METHOD: Following initial piloting, construct validity was tested via cross-sectional comparison of data from clinical and non-clinical samples with anomalous experiences. Interrater reliability was also assessed. RESULTS: Scores from AANEX measuring appraisals, responses and social support differentiated the clinical and nonclinical groups. Interrater reliability was satisfactory for 65 of the 71 items. Six items were subsequently amended. CONCLUSIONS: The AANEX is a valid multidimensional instrument that provides a detailed assessment of psychotic-like experiences and subjective variables relevant to the development of a need for clinical care.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1192/bjp.191.51.s23

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2007-12-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

51

Pages

s23 - s30

Keywords

Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Observer Variation, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Psychotic Disorders, Reproducibility of Results, Social Support