Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

This article considers power in clinical psychology. It is argued that power is present at every level of clinical psychologists' practice and can be used positively and negatively. Drawing on organizational, ethical, psychological, and personal influences, a heuristic problem-solving model for the process of understanding and resolving power-related ethical dilemmas is proposed. It is contended that such a model provides a humane and systematic process of understanding and working through power-related ethical dilemmas. It is argued that resolving power-related ethical issues cannot be achieved through the statement of absolute values but rather requires a process of understanding, action, and review. The model is used to draw out implications for promoting ethical practice and preventing the abuse of power in clinical psychology.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1207/s15327019eb0901_2

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

1999-01-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

9

Pages

21 - 37

Total pages

16

Keywords

American Psychological Association, Bioethics and Professional Ethics, Mental Health Therapies, Professional Patient Relationship, Behavior, Behavior Control, Codes of Ethics, Counseling, Education, Ethical Theory, Ethics, Ethics, Professional, Health Personnel, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Professional Misconduct, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychology, Psychotherapy, Sexuality, Social Dominance, Societies, Societies, Scientific