Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Behavioral and brain potential measures were employed to compare interference in Eriksen and Simon tasks. Assuming a dual-process model of interference elicited in speeded response tasks, we hypothesized that only lateralized stimuli in the Simon task induce fast S-R priming via direct unconditional processes, while Eriksen interference effects are induced later via indirect conditional processes. Delays to responses for incongruent trials were indeed larger in the Eriksen than in the Simon task. Only lateralized stimuli in the Simon task elicited early S-R priming, maximal at parietal areas. Incongruent flankers in the Eriksen task elicited interference later, visible as a lateralized N2. Eriksen interference also elicited an additional component (N350), which accounted for the larger behavioral interference effects in the Eriksen task. The findings suggest that interference and its resolution involve different processes for Simon and Eriksen tasks.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.bandc.2013.06.001

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2013-08-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

82

Pages

353 - 363

Total pages

10

Keywords

Cognitive control, Dual-process model, ERPs, Eriksen flanker task, Lateralized N2, Simon task, Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Choice Behavior, Cognition, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Female, Functional Laterality, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Neuropsychological Tests, Young Adult