Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BACKGROUND: Since cognitive impairment is a clinical hallmark of Alzheimer's disease, suitable assessments are essential for treatment and research following onset. The most widely used and researched cognitive impairment measure in clinical trials of Alzheimer's Disease is the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subscale. Early evidence reported that the measure demonstrated acceptable levels of reliability and validity based on traditional psychometric approaches. Later, more advanced psychometric approaches, such as Item Response Theory, have been implemented to evaluate this measure. Item Response Theory provides details on reliability of different cognitive impairment levels for each item. We aimed to examine tasks discriminating cognitive impairment levels using Item Response Theory based on individual-level participant clinical trial data. METHOD: Participants: Individual-level participant data (N = 2,198) of five randomized controlled double-blinded trials of donepezil conducted by Eisai Co. Ltd. MEASURES: Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Subscale is a neuropsychological index of cognitive impairment, indicating the severity of cognitive symptoms in Alzheimer's disease. It consists of 11 items to assess memory, language, and praxis functions. Analytic plan: The Graded Response Model, a form of Item Response Theory, was implemented in the 'ltm' package in R. Item discrimination parameters (α) map the ability of an item to discriminate impairment levels. Discrimination parameter values for items ranging from 0.01 to 0.24 are considered very low, 0.25 to 0.64 are low, 0.65 to 1.34 are moderate, 1.35 to 1.69 are high, and over 1.7 are very high. RESULT: Word recall had the highest ability to discriminate underlying cognitive impairment levels (α=1.92). Four tasks (Spoken language ability, Comprehension of spoken language, Remembering test instruction, and Word finding difficulty) had low item discrimination parameters meaning that these tasks lacked the ability to discriminate underlying cognitive impairment levels. This left seven discriminating tasks (Word recall, Commands, Naming, Constructional praxis, Ideation praxis, Orientation, Word recognition). CONCLUSION: Seven items separated placebo from donepezil in five pivotal clinical trials of donepezil compared with placebo for Alzheimer's disease. The current study contributes to knowledge on Alzheimer's disease by identifying tasks that discriminate cognitive impairment levels, with potential use for treatment monitoring in moderate-stage Alzheimer's disease.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1002/alz70857_096753

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2025-12-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

21