Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

For over half a century, antipsychotic efficacy for schizophrenia treatment has been tied to dopamine D2 receptor antagonism, with predictable trade-offs: limited impact on negative and cognitive symptoms, and substantial metabolic, endocrine, and motor adverse effects. In the past few years, schizophrenia drug development has re-accelerated, including the first US approval of a non-D2 antipsychotic mechanism (xanomeline-trospium), and several late-stage programmes aiming to treat symptom domains that matter most to long-term functioning. At the same time, several high-profile "dopamine-sparing" agents have failed in phase 2 and 3 trials, underscoring that mechanistic novelty alone is insufficient. Successful translation requires alignment among biological targets, trial design, and patient phenotypes. In this review, we examine emerging interventions and propose a pragmatic translational framework centered on domain-specific prescribing, earlier implementation of measurement-based care, and biomarker-informed stratification.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.sjpmh.2026.02.004

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2026-03-03T00:00:00+00:00

Keywords

Glutamate, Muscarinic, Pharmacology, Psychosis, Schizophrenia