Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Not everyone who reports having a medical or psychiatric diagnosis self-identifies as disabled. However, many services and research instruments are framed for those who self-identify as disabled. It is important to understand the characteristics of individuals with impairments who do not self-identify as disabled to appropriately address this population. In this study, we explored whether adults with chronic conditions self-identified as disabled at different rates across demographic categories as well as whether there are differences between groups on antidisability prejudice and self-esteem. RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN: Adults within the United States completed online surveys as part of a larger study. Of those who reported having chronic conditions, 286 self-identified as disabled, and 71 did not. We compared responses to demographic questions and attitudinal scales between these two groups using t tests, linear regressions, and binary logistic regressions. RESULTS: Participants who self-identified as disabled were more likely to be younger and have a higher socioeconomic status than those who did not self-identify as disabled. There were significant differences by gender, sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, educational and employment status, political beliefs, and neurodivergent self-identification. When controlling for demographic variables, participants who self-identified as disabled reported lower self-esteem but no differences in antidisability prejudice compared with those who did not. CONCLUSION/IMPLICATIONS: Services and research instruments that only address people who self-identify as disabled may reach a different population as those with impairments who do not self-identify as disabled. Further research should be conducted regarding internalized ableism, disability identity, and self-esteem from a longitudinal perspective. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1037/rep0000662

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2026-03-26T00:00:00+00:00