Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

We investigated how proactive and reactive control facilitates performance in mixed stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) tasks. SRC effects were eliminated in mixed tasks and reversed following incompatible trials. In mixed tasks, early preferential response activation was present in stimulus-locked lateralized readiness potentials (LRPs) but reduced following incompatible trials. In event-related potentials (ERPs), stimulus-locked N2 was enhanced in all mixed trials but was not significantly influenced by the preceding trial. A response-locked fronto-central negative component (N-120), peaking just before the response, was largest for mixed compatible trials preceded by incompatible trials. This N-120 was paired with an enhancement to the peak of the response-locked LRP. Proactive control is involved in selection of an S-R mapping via the indirect route of a dual-route model. Reactive control corrects the S-R mapping, particularly when alternating between S-R mappings.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01368.x

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2012-06-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

49

Pages

756 - 769

Total pages

13

Keywords

Adult, Cognition, Contingent Negative Variation, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Face, Female, Functional Laterality, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Young Adult