Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BACKGROUND: Psychosis is a transdiagnostic condition which can manifest as part of many disorders including those of primary psychiatric origin, or secondary to a medical condition. This study aims to systematically review and quantify the diagnostic accuracy of electroencephalography (EEG) in identifying people with psychosis secondary to a medical condition. METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy was implemented across multiple databases. Inclusion criteria specified observational human studies with a minimum of 20 participants experiencing psychosis who underwent EEG. The reference standard was the final clinical diagnosis. Two reviewers independently assessed article inclusion using predefined eligibility criteria. Data were extracted by two blinded reviewers. A bivariate meta-analysis was conducted to model the correlation between sensitivity and specificity. FINDINGS: The search strategy yielded 8688 results, of which 38 were eligible. The main diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis found that the sensitivity (i.e., the proportion of patients with secondary psychosis who had an abnormal EEG) was 0·71 (95 % CI 0·61-0·80) and the specificity (i.e., the proportion of patients with primary psychosis who had a normal EEG) was 0·67 (95 % CI 0·58-0·74). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0·67, corresponding to poor discrimination. The pattern for each of the specific EEG abnormalities was a low-moderate sensitivity and high specificity. INTERPRETATION: EEG demonstrates poor discrimination in identifying a secondary psychosis. Specific EEG abnormalities exhibit potential diagnostic value, encouraging more detailed reporting standards. While EEG alone does not definitively distinguish psychosis aetiology, its integration with clinical assessment may enhance diagnostic precision.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.schres.2025.07.020

Type

Journal article

Journal

Schizophr Res

Publication Date

31/07/2025

Volume

284

Pages

48 - 58

Keywords

EEG, Meta-analysis, Psychosis, Schizophrenia, Systematic review