Tacrolimus monitoring in renal transplantation: A comparison between high-performance liquid chromatography and immunoassay
Borrows R., Chusney G., Loucaidou M., Singh S., James A., Stichbury J., Van Tromp J., Cairns T., Griffith M., Hakim N., McLean A., Palmer A., Papalois V., Taube D.
It is recommended that specific methods of tacrolimus monitoring rather than immunoassays, which overestimate tacrolimus levels, should be used in transplant recipients. Direct comparison of these techniques, however, has not been conducted in renal transplantation. In this study, 40 renal transplant recipients with tacrolimus monitoring by microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA; target trough level 10 to 15 ng/mL) were compared with 40 patients monitored by high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS; target trough level 8 to 13 ng/mL). All patients received anti CD25 antibody induction and mycophenolate mofetil in a steroid-sparing protocol. No differences were seen between MEIA and HPLC-MS groups in patient demographics. All patients were followed for 6 months. Patient survival was 100% in both groups; graft survival was 100% in the MEIA group and 97.5% in the HPLC-MS group. The groups did not differ in the number of dose changes required in the first 6 months or in the number of patients displaying tacrolimus levels within target range at 3 and 6 months. Delayed graft function occurred in 14 patients in the MEIA group and 12 patients in the HPLC-MS group (P = NS). Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in four patients in the MEIA group and one patient in the HPLC-MS group (P