Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with an "at-risk mental state" (or "prodromal" symptoms) have a 20-40% chance of developing psychosis; however it is difficult to predict which of them will become ill on the basis of their clinical symptoms alone. We examined whether neurophysiological markers could help to identify those who are particularly vulnerable. METHOD: 35 cases meeting PACE criteria for the at-risk mental state (ARMS) and 57 controls performed an auditory oddball task whilst their electroencephalogram was recorded. The latency and amplitude of the P300 and N100 waves were compared between groups using linear regression. RESULTS: The P300 amplitude was significantly reduced in the ARMS group [8.6+/-6.4 microvolt] compared to controls [12.7+/-5.8 microvolt] (p<0.01). There were no group differences in P300 latency or in the amplitude and latency of the N100. Of the at-risk subjects that were followed up, seven (21%) developed psychosis. CONCLUSION: Reduction in the amplitude of the P300 is associated with an increased vulnerability to psychosis. Neurophysiological and other biological markers may be of use to predict clinical outcomes in populations at high risk.

Original publication




Journal article



Publication Date





553 - 560


Adolescent, Brain, Electroencephalography, Event-Related Potentials, P300, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychotic Disorders, Risk Factors