Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

A new online seminar series is exploring the ‘ethics of exercise’ during coronavirus lockdown measures in the UK.

Run by David Lyreskog, a postdoctoral researcher in the Neuroscience, Ethics & Society (NEUROSEC) group in the Department of Psychiatry, the series looks at questions of why, how and when we should be exercising – both in lockdown and beyond. 

Current lockdown measures in the UK include limitations and restrictions on outdoor and group exercise, while in parallel exercise is generally encouraged for physical and mental health.

Topics covered in the multidisciplinary seminars include risk mitigation, social signalling, stigmatisation, and mental and physical health impacts.

 

The guidelines about exercise during the UK lockdown stood out to me as a topic of great importance to the public. As one of the few valid "excuses" permitting people to leave the home, there was – and still is – a remarkable amount that is unclear about what exactly we are supposed to be doing as a form of exercise, and when and how we should be doing it. - David Lyreskog, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford.

 

By running the series, David aims to ‘bridge the gap’ between the growing public interest in this topic – particularly during the pandemic – and the lack of attention it is receiving. 

There is a wide range of ethical issues specifically tied to exercise in these times, which need to be scrutinised.

  • To what extent do the guidelines trigger and/or worsen cases of eating disorders, depression and anxiety?
  • What do we signal to others by being out exercising in public, and is that something we should consider at all?
  • How, if at all, can we assess whether the exercise restrictions were implemented in an ethically justifiable manner?

 

David continues, ‘Ultimately, it boils down to fundamental, ethical questions about what people – as individuals and as groups – ought to be doing when there is no clear “right” answer to be had. My hope is that by analysing the ethical dimensions of our situation, we can learn from these experiences and improve our understanding of the relationships between exercise, health and morality – not only for any lockdown scenarios to come, but more generally for our future.’

The first seminar took place on 7 May and featured guest speaker Dr Jonathan Pugh from the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, as well as discussion among attendees. It is available to watch here.

David will be running future sessions on Zoom at the following dates and times:

Session 2: 21 May 2020, 3-3.45pm

Session 3: 28 May 2020, 3-3.45pm

Session 4: 4 June 2020, 3-3.45pm

Please email David for details if you would like to attend.

NIHR OXFORD HEALTH BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CENTRE NEWS

Please follow the link below to read the news on the NIHR BRC website.

Similar stories

Childhood Abdominal Pain May Be Linked to Disordered Eating in Teenagers

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Early intervention Mental Health

New research shows that people who suffer from recurrent abdominal pain in childhood may be more likely to have disordered eating as teenagers.

Messaging Focused on Personal Rather Than Collective Benefits is More Effective for COVID-19 Vaccination

COVID-19

The largest ever study of COVID-19 vaccine messaging shows that emphasising the personal benefits of vaccination may be the most effective way to persuade people who are sceptical about the jab.

Future-Proofing Mental Health

COVID-19 Early intervention Mental Health

UK academics are calling for targets for mental health research in order to meet the healthcare challenges of the next decade. Published today in Journal of Mental Health, researchers set out four overarching goals that will speed up implementation of mental health research and give a clear direction for researchers and funders to focus their efforts when it comes to better understanding the treatment of mental health.

Children and Adolescents’ Mental Health: One Year On

COVID-19 Child and adolescent Mental Health

Parents and carers reported that behavioural, emotional and attentional difficulties in their children changed considerably throughout the past year, increasing in times of national lockdown and decreasing as restrictions eased and schools reopened, according to the latest Co-SPACE (COVID-19 Supporting Parents, Adolescents, and Children in Epidemics) study, led by experts at the University of Oxford.

New UK Pandemic Ethics Accelerator Brings Ethical Thinking into Pandemic Policy-Making

COVID-19

The UK Pandemic Ethics Accelerator, which launched today, harnesses and mobilises the UK’s internationally renowned expertise in ethics research. Four major UK universities and the Nuffield Council on Bioethics form the collaborative.

Risk of Rare Blood Clotting Higher for COVID-19 than for Vaccines

COVID-19

Researchers at the University of Oxford have today reported that the risk of the rare blood clotting known as cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) following COVID-19 infection is around 100 times greater than normal, several times higher than it is post-vaccination or following influenza.