Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

BACKGROUND: Special observation (the allocation of nurses to watch over nominated patients) is one means by which psychiatric services endeavour to keep in-patients safe from harm. The practice is both contentious and of unknown efficacy. AIMS: To assess the relationship between special observation and self-harm rates, by ward, while controlling for potential confounding variables. METHOD: A multivariate cross-sectional study collecting data on self-harm, special observation, other conflict and containment, physical environment, patient and staff factors for a 6-month period on 136 acute-admission psychiatric wards. RESULTS: Constant special observation was not associated with self-harm rates, but intermittent observation was associated with reduced self-harm, as were levels of qualified nursing staff and more intense programmes of patient activities. CONCLUSIONS: Certain features of nursing deployment and activity may serve to protect patients. The efficacy of constant special observation remains open to question.

Original publication

DOI

10.1192/bjp.bp.107.037721

Type

Journal article

Journal

Br J Psychiatry

Publication Date

11/2008

Volume

193

Pages

395 - 401

Keywords

Attitude of Health Personnel, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Cross-Sectional Studies, Delivery of Health Care, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Mental Disorders, Mentally Ill Persons, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Patient Care, Psychiatric Department, Hospital, Psychiatric Nursing, Self-Injurious Behavior, United Kingdom