Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

<jats:sec id="S0007125019000229_sec_a1"><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>In-patients in crisis report poor experiences of mental healthcare not conducive to recovery. Concerns include coercion by staff, fear of assault from other patients, lack of therapeutic opportunities and limited support. There is little high-quality evidence on what is important to patients to inform recovery-focused care.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S0007125019000229_sec_a2"><jats:title>Aims</jats:title><jats:p>To conduct a systematic review of published literature, identifying key themes for improving experiences of in-patient mental healthcare.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S0007125019000229_sec_a3" sec-type="methods"><jats:title>Method</jats:title><jats:p>A systematic search of online databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO and CINAHL) for primary research published between January 2000 and January 2016. All study designs from all countries were eligible. A qualitative analysis was undertaken and study quality was appraised. A patient and public reference group contributed to the review.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S0007125019000229_sec_a4" sec-type="results"><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Studies (72) from 16 countries found four dimensions were consistently related to significantly influencing in-patients' experiences of crisis and recovery-focused care: the importance of high-quality relationships; averting negative experiences of coercion; a healthy, safe and enabling physical and social environment; and authentic experiences of patient-centred care. Critical elements for patients were trust, respect, safe wards, information and explanation about clinical decisions, therapeutic activities, and family inclusion in care.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S0007125019000229_sec_a5" sec-type="conclusion"><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>A number of experiences hinder recovery-focused care and must be addressed with the involvement of staff to provide high-quality in-patient services. Future evaluations of service quality and development of practice guidance should embed these four dimensions.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S0007125019000229_sec_a6"><jats:title>Declaration of interest</jats:title><jats:p>K.B. is editor of <jats:italic>British Journal of Psychiatry</jats:italic> and leads a national programme (Synergi Collaborative Centre) on patient experiences driving change in services and inequalities.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Original publication




Journal article


The British Journal of Psychiatry


Royal College of Psychiatrists

Publication Date





329 - 338