Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

<jats:sec id="S2056472418000315_sec_a1"><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Literature has focused on effect sizes rather than individual-level improvement rates to determine how effectively services address burgeoning numbers of adolescents with anxiety and depression.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S2056472418000315_sec_a2"><jats:title>Aims</jats:title><jats:p>To consider how many adolescents report reliable improvement in anxiety, depression and comorbid depression and anxiety by end of treatment.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S2056472418000315_sec_a3" sec-type="methods"><jats:title>Method</jats:title><jats:p>The primary outcome was reliable improvement (i.e. change greater than likely the result of measurement error) in self-reported anxiety and depression for N = 4464 adolescents (mean age 14.5 years, s.d. = 1.9; 75% female; 61% White) seen in specialist mental health services in England.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S2056472418000315_sec_a4" sec-type="results"><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>In total, 53% of those with anxiety, 44% with depression, and 35% with comorbid depression and anxiety showed reliable improvement.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S2056472418000315_sec_a5" sec-type="conclusion"><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Improvement rates were higher than previously reported, but lower than generally used in advice to the public. There may be a need to set more realistic expectations, including with young people who seek help.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="S2056472418000315_sec_a6"><jats:title>Declaration of interest</jats:title><jats:p>All authors were involved in the programme of service transformation that this report draws on. M.W. led the outcomes and evaluation group that agreed the approach to measurement used in the initiative.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Original publication

DOI

10.1192/bjo.2018.31

Type

Journal article

Journal

BJPsych Open

Publisher

Royal College of Psychiatrists

Publication Date

07/2018

Volume

4

Pages

250 - 255