Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

A catchment area-based sample of patients recruited for an eating disorder treatment trial was compared with patients from the same geographical area seen in the 12 months before and after the trial. The three samples were very similar. The research sample was representative of the usual clinic sample from which it had been selected and thus the results could be extrapolated with some confidence to other similar clinical settings. It is concluded that whilst treatment trials, by their very nature, have explicit and implicit inclusion and exclusion criteria with appropriate designs they can be usefully representative.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.brat.2009.06.019

Type

Journal article

Journal

Behav Res Ther

Publication Date

10/2009

Volume

47

Pages

893 - 896

Keywords

Feeding and Eating Disorders, Humans, Patient Selection, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic