Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

OBJECTIVE: To validate an item bank for assessing and detecting psychological distress in cancer patients by (1) identifying whether additional items are required in the full item bank; (2) identifying any item bias in the existing item bank; (3) linking levels of distress against thresholds derived from gold-standard psychiatric interviews (PSE/SCAN/SCID). METHOD: A Rasch analysis was conducted on a heterogeneous sample of cancer patients (n=4919) who had completed a combination of eight psychological distress screening instruments. A subset of patients had completed a psychiatric interview along with the HADS (n=381) or PHQ-9 (n=440). Item thresholds were plotted along the latent trait. Furthermore, items were assessed for differential item functioning (DIF) by age and gender. Finally, optimum thresholds were derived for the HADS and PHQ-9 and plotted along the latent trait distribution for the entire item bank. RESULT: Item thresholds exceeded the range of person measures, although a gap was still present along the latent trait. No DIF was observed for either age or gender. Putative cut-offs were derived for the item bank detecting moderate to severe levels of psychological distress. CONCLUSION: The item bank covers the majority of levels of emotional distress reported by cancer patients. Additionally, initial thresholds have been derived on the item bank, which correspond to a formal psychiatric assessment. Further work is required to ascertain the stability of the item bank over time and by diagnosis and stage of disease, as well as to determine additional thresholds for levels of distress


Journal article



Publication Date





195 - 199


age, analysis, assessment, bias, cancer, care, diagnosis, disease, distress, distribution, gender, HAD, HADS, health, interview, Interviews, measure, measures, patient, Patients, psychiatric, psychological, screening, social, stability, time, uk, Universities, WHO, work