Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The use of Ritalin and other stimulant drug treatments for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) raises distinctive moral dilemmas for parents; these moral dilemmas have not been adequately addressed in the bioethics literature. This paper draws upon data from a qualitative empirical study to investigate parents' use of the moral ideal of authenticity as part of their narrative justifications for dosing decisions and actions. I show that therapeutic decisions and actions are embedded in valued cultural ideals about masculinity, self-actualization and success, as well as in moral conceptions of authenticity and personal freedom. I argue that this investigation of parents' moral justifications and dosing dilemmas raises questions about the validity of authenticity as a transcendent moral principle. Moreover, this study demonstrates that in order to be relevant, bioethical analysis of neurocognitive enhancement must engage with ground-up studies of moral principles and decision-making in context.

Original publication

DOI

10.1080/15265160590945129

Type

Journal article

Journal

Am J Bioeth

Publication Date

2005

Volume

5

Pages

34 - 47

Keywords

Analytical Approach, Empirical Approach, Mental Health Therapies, Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Behavior Control, Biomedical Enhancement, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Child, Child Behavior, Cognition, Decision Making, Drug Administration Schedule, Ethical Analysis, Fathers, Female, Humans, Intention, Male, Methylphenidate, Mothers, Narration, Parenting, Personality, Qualitative Research, Reproducibility of Results, Sports, Surveys and Questionnaires