Machine learning meta-analysis identifies individual characteristics moderating cognitive intervention efficacy for anxiety and depression symptoms.
Richter T., Shani R., Tal S., Derakshan N., Cohen N., Enock PM., McNally RJ., Mor N., Daches S., Williams AD., Yiend J., Carlbring P., Kuckertz JM., Yang W., Reinecke A., Beevers CG., Bunnell BE., Koster EHW., Zilcha-Mano S., Okon-Singer H.
Cognitive training is a promising intervention for psychological distress; however, its effectiveness has yielded inconsistent outcomes across studies. This research is a pre-registered individual-level meta-analysis to identify factors contributing to cognitive training efficacy for anxiety and depression symptoms. Machine learning methods, alongside traditional statistical approaches, were employed to analyze 22 datasets with 1544 participants who underwent working memory training, attention bias modification, interpretation bias modification, or inhibitory control training. Baseline depression and anxiety symptoms were found to be the most influential factor, with individuals with more severe symptoms showing the greatest improvement. The number of training sessions was also important, with more sessions yielding greater benefits. Cognitive trainings were associated with higher predicted improvement than control conditions, with attention and interpretation bias modification showing the most promise. Despite the limitations of heterogeneous datasets, this investigation highlights the value of large-scale comprehensive analyses in guiding the development of personalized training interventions.