Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

New Rapid Ethics Review from the UK Pandemic Ethics Accelerator investigates the question of whether or not children should be offered vaccination against COVID-19, a question which has raised significant ethical challenges.

Syringe with COVID-19 vaccine label held in gloved hand

Dr Alex McKeown from the Neuroscience, Ethics and Society (NEUROSEC) group in the Department of Psychiatry and Deputy Director of the UK Pandemic Ethics Accelerator, a collaborative of four major UK universities and the Nuffield Council on Bioethics, has co-authored a Rapid Ethics Review with fellow Ethics Accelerator researcher Jonathan Pugh from the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics.

Now that the vaccination for children policy has been implemented, the Review looks retrospectively at the ethical challenges:

  • Taking into account best interests
  • Capacity to consent
  • Vaccine mandates
  • Data governance issues.

Whether children should be vaccinated against COVID-19 turns on a range of factors, including capacity, age, the balance between vaccine safety and COVID-related harm, and data security. As is the case with adults, there is a need to ensure an ethical balance between individual freedom, public health, and vaccine safety; as such, questions about whether vaccination should be a condition of certain kinds of activity – for example, school attendance - are of particular ethical significance in children. Given the widespread need for collection of personal information to help control the pandemic, there are notable uncertainties about current and future data security, sharing, and reuse, which also affects the balance of ethical benefits and risks in vaccinating children.

These questions are particularly challenging because the term 'child' covers an age range where capacity is developing and can vary extensively from one individual to another. In particular, it overlaps with adolescence, so while all individuals under age 18 may be regarded in law as children, the inability to give informed consent cannot be inferred from this fact alone. The Review outlines some of the key ethical and legal considerations at stake in questions about informed consent for childhood vaccination in the context of COVID-19.

The collaborative’s Principal Investigator, Ilina Singh, Professor of Neuroscience & Society in the Department of Psychiatry and Co-Director of the Wellcome Centre for Ethics & Humanities at the University of Oxford, said:


'The issue of vaccination of school-age children for COVID-19 will continue to come up as a key ethical and policy challenge. In the short term, we should assess capacity to consent in young people. However, in the long term we need a review of UK standards for consent in this population, based more thoroughly in evidence of developing consent capacities across age groups. It's important that the values and preferences of young people are taken into account when making these policy decisions.'

Alex McKeown, said:

'This review is an example of how the collaborative approach of the Ethics Accelerator, both across Oxford and with partner institutions, can make a vital contribution to public discussion of and engagement with the numerous ethical challenges raised by the COVID-19 pandemic.'

Read the full Rapid Ethics Review.

For more information about the UK Pandemic Ethics Accelerator.


Please follow the link below to read the news on the NIHR BRC website.

Similar stories

How Mindfulness May Improve Body Satisfaction and Mood

New research from Emma Osborne, Research Assistant at the Centre for Research on Eating Disorders (CREDO) at the University of Oxford (and PhD Candidate at the University of Bath), and Dr Melissa Atkinson, University of Bath, investigated two ways in which mindfulness might improve body satisfaction and mood.

Review Highlights Risk Factors Associated with Violence in Schizophrenia

Researchers at Oxford University’s Department of Psychiatry have found that people with schizophrenia and related disorders are at higher-than-average risk of perpetrating violence, but that the overall risk remains low (less than 1 in 20 in women, and less than 1 in 4 for men over a 35-year period for violent arrests and crimes).

New Study will Investigate Brain Fog Symptoms in Post-Hospitalised COVID-19 Patients

C-Fog is a collaborative new study led by Oxford University researcher, Dr Maxime Taquet, which will investigate the reasons why brain fog or cognition problems affect patients after COVID-19 infection. With a better understanding of the mechanisms involved it may be possible to understand how to treat brain fog and help many thousands of people worldwide.

A New Experimental Study Investigated the Effects of Atorvastatin on Emotional Processing

Atorvastatin is one of a group of statins widely used to treat heart and blood vessel diseases. The medication works by lowering cholesterol in the blood. This new study shows that atorvastatin influences the way people experience certain emotions, giving us important insights about disorders such as anxiety and depression.

People with Long-COVID After Hospitalisation Face Limited Recovery After One Year

People who were hospitalised with COVID-19 and continued to experience symptoms five months later, show limited further recovery one year after hospital discharge, according to the latest results of a major national study looking at the long-term health impacts of COVID-19 on hospitalised patients.

The Effects of Social Media on Public Attention and Attitudes Towards COVID-19 Vaccines in the UK

A new study finds that media coverage of positive vaccine research can have a positive effect on overall social media sentiment, countering vaccine misinformation, but the effects wane over time.