Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Aims and method. A randomised, blind comparison of a structured consent procedure against routine consent was conducted to determine whether it had any utility in improving treatment knowledge in patients receiving electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Additionally we aimed to determine whether degree of cognitive impairment, intelligence and severity of depression influenced recall of information. Results. Thirty-two subjects were investigated. Structured consent significantly improved the number of knowledge items recalled pre-ECT (P < 0.05). Knowledge scores declined significantly after completion of the treatment course in both structured consent (P < 0.05) and control groups (P < 0.05). There was a significant correlation between Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores and the number of knowledge items recalled both pre- (r = 0.43, P < 0.05) and post-ECT (r = 0.53, P < 0.01). Clinical implications. Structured consent procedures may be a useful way of improving patient knowledge of ECT and merit further study. Low scores on MMSE should caution clinicians to take particular care when consenting patients to ECT.

Original publication

DOI

10.1192/pb.23.8.471

Type

Journal article

Journal

Psychiatric Bulletin

Publication Date

01/01/1999

Volume

23

Pages

471 - 474